Two purpose built community high schools, Ardnamurchan High School which was a new
school, and Glen Urquhart High School which was a new building, opened in August 2002 in
Highland Region, as a result of active campaigning by local community members and
councillors over an extended number of years.
The Highland Future Schools (HFS) Project funded by the Scottish Executive Education
Department’s (SEED), Future Learning and Teaching (FLaT) Programme (between March
2002 and March 2004), was conceived by the Local Authority Director of Education during
the planning stages of the two schools. The project was seen as an opportunity to provide and
use technology in support of learning to enable further and better opportunities for both
schools and their local communities. The important role of the school in the community is
evident in the HFS project, the aim of which is to use ICT to:
· raise achievement of school pupils;
· enhance school links with the wider community;
· increase the local skills base through home-school-community ICT
partnerships.
The two schools were purpose built to similar designs. However, they have sought to shape
their participation in the project to match their individual circumstances, and maximise the
benefits to their pupils, teachers, parents and local communities. Each school received ICT
equipment, including a laptop for each member of staff to use for their own professional
purposes. In Ardnamurchan High School each pupil has been given personal use of a
laptop/tablet PC. Glen Urquhart High School received laptops, but not for personal use by
pupils. They were used in classrooms as an additional resource together with existing desktop
computers, and were a shared resource throughout the school.
This executive summary brings together the findings from both schools under the four aims of
the evaluation. The main body of the report deals with each school separately.
The evaluation of the project commenced in March 2005 and concluded in May 2006. It has
four main aims.
Aim 1 Assessment of the overall impact of the project on teachers, pupils, parents and other
stakeholders associated with both schools;
Aim 2 Identification of what, if any, impact the project has had on attainment, achievement,
attendance, motivation, school ethos, planning and the learning and teaching
environment;
Aim 3 Assessment of the project's impact in improving home-school and community links
and building partnerships with other educational/training providers;
Aim 4 Identification of what, if any improvements the use of ICT has made in terms of
developing and delivering greater learning and teaching opportunities for teachers,
pupils and adult learners.
The methodology has combined quantitative and qualitative approaches in both schools. It
included: a questionnaire survey of teachers, pupils and parents; semi-structured interviews
with a sample of teachers and pupils; semi-structured interviews with the Headteachers, ICT
coordinators; community education staff, local authority staff; and classroom observations.
We present a summary of our findings listed under each of the four evaluation aims.
Aim 1
The assessment of the overall impact of the project on teachers, pupils, parents and other
stakeholders associated with both schools.
a) The local authority
· The Authority provided the ICT infrastructure and resources necessary to set up
and maintain the project in both schools. However, it was constrained by the
existing service level agreement with the managed service provider (MSP),
which allowed it very little flexibility to support the schools.
· Despite the Authority’s best efforts and regular communication with the
schools it was often unable to promptly resolve many of the ongoing technical
problems experienced by the schools, for example, the restrictions on access to
the school intranet due to the terms of the agreement with the MSP.
· The Authority acknowledged it had not anticipated some of the problems, for
example, synchronisation of files, which arose from individual use of
laptop/tablet PCs.
· The ongoing costs of laptop provision for Ardnamurchan High School were
borne by the Authority.
· The Authority was aware that such a heavily ICT resourced project required
some commitment to sustain it in both schools, with a need to continually
upgrade resources.
b) The school/senior management team
· The schools benefited from the provision of new ICT resources and facilities
for teaching and learning.
· The school/senior management teams were supported by the Authority, but
prevented from achieving certain aims, i.e. home-school links, due to the terms
of the Authority’s existing service level agreement with the MSP.
· The schools were dependent on the Authority to sort out the variety of technical
problems which ensued.
· The schools were constrained by a lack of onsite technical support which
prevented them from taking a proactive approach to problems as they arose.
· The schools had concerns about the replacement costs of the desktop and
laptop/tablet PCs when newer models were required.
· Ardnamurchan High School was supported by the Authority to enable it to
lease laptops after the two years of SEED support ended.
c) The teachers
· Use of a personal laptop gave teachers the flexibility of use between school and
home. It assisted teachers in the preparation and presentation of teaching
material and administration tasks.
· Technical difficulties hindered the project’s development, such that the impact
of ICT has been varied and perhaps slow to effect a change in pedagogy. Some
departments for example, technology in Ardnamurchan High School, had made
significant advances in the use of ICT.
· Ardnamurchan teachers incurred additional problems to the Glen Urquhart
teachers due to the pupils using personal laptop/tablet PCs: the technical
problems; time delays in class logging on to the server and no guarantee that all
pupils would bring the laptop/tablet PCs to the class.
d) The pupils
· The enhanced ICT resources increased pupils’ ICT skills, motivation and
engagement with learning.
· The use of ICT provided an enriched curriculum for pupils.
· ICT provided easy access to resources for pupils, a curriculum and resources
better targeted to different styles of learning.
· ICT offered opportunities for pupils to learn independently/take responsibility
for their own learning. However, the use of ICT by pupils was predominantly
determined by the teachers.
· ICT enhanced presentation of work, and was an aid to revision: providing
summaries which saved pupils time from having to write their own notes.
· Personal mobile technologies have the potential for furthering pupil
independence and ownership of learning.
· Use of the internet distracted pupils from tasks because they visited nonrelevant
sites, and using ICT also wasted pupil time due to delays in logging
in/starting up machines.
· Some pupils were more interested in the use of ICT to aid presentation of their
work rather than its content.
· Pupils were unable to work seamlessly between school and home because they
could not routinely access materials from the school intranet.
· The use of ICT has the potential for health and safety issues due to pupils
sitting in front of computers for long periods of time.
Laptop/tablet PC use
· The lack of network connections, unreliability of the laptop/tablet PC, the
unavailability if it was being repaired, and various technical problems resulted
in pupil de-motivation and frustration.
· Pupils also voiced frustration if the laptop was not frequently used, mainly as it
was considered to be too heavy to carry around all day.
e) The adult learners/community users (including parents)
· The opening of the new buildings brought facilities and resources, learning
opportunities to the community which were previously inaccessible without
travelling long distances.
· Incompatibility of firewall systems between the community and school caused
problems for providers.
· There appeared to be some lack of clarity in the communication between school
personnel and community educators around ownership and access to ICT
equipment, in particular during the early days of the project at Glen Urquhart
High School.
· The location of ICT equipment within the school building raised issues of
safety if members of the public were using equipment during the day. This
caused some tension between the different needs of the school and the
community within the shared building, with the former looking to ensure safety
of its pupils, and the community facility wanting to encourage adult access in a
user-friendly manner.
Aim 2
The identification of what, if any, impact the project has had on attainment, achievement,
attendance, motivation, school ethos, planning and the learning and teaching environment.
a) Attainment, achievement, motivation and attendance
· With respect to raising achievement, qualitative reports from teachers, pupils
and parents indicate that using ICT has had a positive impact on pupils’
motivation, enthusiasm for and engagement with learning, and has raised the
level of pupils’ ICT skills.
· Over three quarters of teachers strongly agreed/agreed that ‘using ICT leads to
raised attainment for many pupils’. However, they felt unable to provide hard
indicators for this.
· In order to assess whether the personal use of a laptop/tablet PC by pupils had
made any impact on attendance, the quantitative data collected by
Ardnamurchan High School on pupil attendance and behaviour was scrutinised.
The data presented an inconclusive picture. It is also difficult to make any
claims as to the impact of the project on attendance, as other variables/school
initiatives may have had a greater impact.
b) The learning and teaching environment
· The project has enabled the two new school buildings to be equipped with state
of the art technology.
· For Glen Urquhart High School it has enhanced provision compared to the
previous lack of ICT equipment in the old school building.
· For Ardnamurchan High School it has provided ICT resources and facilities in
a location where previously no high school existed.
· The ICT facilities and resources include personal laptops for all staff in both
schools, and personal laptops or tablet PCs for pupils in Ardnamurchan High
School; interactive whiteboards and data projectors in some classes; suites of
desktop machines in ICT, graphic communication, and videoconferencing
equipment.
Aim 3
The assessment of the project’s impact in improving home-school and community links and
building partnerships with other educational/training providers
a) Home-school-community links
· The intention to provide home-school links through the use of ICT for teachers
and pupils, with teachers and pupils accessing work from the school intranet,
proved impossible for the MSP, local authority and schools to achieve, due to a
combination of technical and network security reasons.
· One aspect of ICT use beginning to be introduced by some teachers was the use
of email for communication with parents. This has supported links between
home and school.
· Similarly, the aim to improve school-community links for the adult learners and
community users was hampered for network security reasons, with the
managed service provider being unwilling to allow external access to the school
network. This resulted in the partner providers or community staff having to
install their own firewall systems.
b) Building partnerships with other educational/training providers
· The level of success appears to have depended to some extent on how the
partnership arrangements were initially established when the centres opened.
· The development and sustaining of partnerships has proved to be more
successful at Ardnamurchan High School, where initially personnel were
employed on a joint local authority/FE partnership which helped to establish a
firm FE presence. Even here, according to community centre staff it has taken
many years to ‘bed in’ community provision.
· The local FE college withdrew support from the Glen Urquhart community
centre, probably for financial reasons, by not replacing a staff member who left.
The attempt to secure ongoing FE provision opportunities was due to the efforts
of the community learning centre officer who was employed by the local
authority.
Aim 4
The identification of what, if any improvements the use of ICT has made in terms of
developing and delivering greater learning and teaching opportunities for teachers, pupils
and adult learners.
a) The teachers
· The use of ICT helped to develop and deliver greater learning and teaching
opportunities for teachers.
· All teachers reported they use email to network and conduct professional
exchanges with colleagues in their subject areas, and half indicated they are
already participating, or beginning to participate, in online discussion groups.
· Less well developed is their use of ICT for their own professional development,
for example, taking a CPD course online, (reported by up to one third),
although more teachers (up to a half) were thinking of doing so in the next one
to two years.
· The project provided support for ICT training that has helped the teachers
improve their own ICT skills, and this has impacted on their teaching practices.
· Teachers now use a variety of ICT technologies: personal laptop; data
projector; and an interactive whiteboard. The teachers have used ICT to create
and edit their own learning materials, particularly differentiated materials.
· The data projector and interactive whiteboard enabled them to produce more
visual and interactive materials. This included the use of image projection on
the interactive whiteboard to enhance explanations of three dimensional or
dynamic concepts.
· The use of the internet has enabled teachers to access key resources and
information from specific curriculum websites. It also provided access to some
ODL (online distance learning) courses and enabled the schools to now offer
and deliver new courses which previously would not have been available for
pupils.
· Teachers have used ICT principally as a tool to improve their existing teaching
and learning practices. There was an acknowledgment that further support and
training are needed to fully integrate ICT into the curriculum, and further
develop more flexible and novel approaches to teaching and learning.
b) The pupils
· ICT has provided the pupils with access to greater learning opportunities. The
internet has improved access to key resources, and the availability of online
learning materials, for example, Scholar.
· Online learning materials together with self-assessment software have allowed
pupils to learn independently and receive feedback on their performance.
· In some subject areas the use of simulations, animations etc. enabled pupils to
experience learning more visually, for example, the rotation of chemical
molecules, or to run experiments which are not practical to do in the classroom.
· ICT helped to remove barriers to learning for those with literacy difficulties
and opened up learning opportunities via email communication with schools
overseas.
c) Adult learners/community use
· The provision of greater learning opportunities has been mixed and has evolved
at different rates at each school.
· The uptake of higher and further education learning opportunities by the
community has proved more successful at Ardnamurchan High School.
Students can access lectures/tutorials from the local FE college via
videoconferencing, and access online courses from the UHI Millennium
Institute.
· The adult learning opportunities were less well developed in Glen Urquhart
High School. Whilst the intention of the school was to ‘create a local learning
and communications web across all areas of the local communities served by
the school’, this has been limited, partly due to the local FE college being
unable to sustain a presence and provide learning/training opportunities locally
for students.
The Highland Future Schools Project is best represented as a journey still being undertaken.
Like many educational developments it is more evolutionary than revolutionary in character.
Some of the project aims were rendered unachievable by circumstances, whilst others are still
in development. It will take a considerable time for the project to become fully embedded in
the schools, and for them to achieve all their aspirations.
The increasing use of ICT in schools, which potentially brings opportunities for pupils and
teachers to work seamlessly between school and home, requires a level of ICT infrastructure
and support that is beyond that which local authorities can offer on their own. The HFS
Project highlighted a number of tensions and difficulties in and around the provision of
reliable and effective computer and network services for teachers, pupils, schools and
communities. Until these problems are resolved, schools, teachers and pupils will find it
difficult to use ICT to its full potential for teaching and learning purposes.
On the basis of our findings, the lessons learned, innovations observed and advice suggested
by each group of stakeholders, we make the following recommendations to other local
authorities and schools considering undertaking similar initiatives, both the provision of
laptops for teachers and/or pupils, and joint school/community provision.
The Local Authority
Should:
· build in flexibility to the service level agreement with the MSP to ensure it is
affordable, but reduces additional on-going costs, and is fully set up to meet
educational needs;
· keep some element of provision of ICT support in-house;
· conduct a risk analysis at the planning stage, and have contingencies available if
original intentions do not go according to plan;
· be aware that an ICT project requires not just one-off costs, but a commitment to
sustain it, including the upgrading and replacement of equipment;
· consider leasing rather than purchasing laptop/tablet PCs;
· provide an ICT infrastructure in schools fit for purpose;
· test out the ICT systems in a limited pilot, particularly when using mobile
technologies, before introducing to the whole school;
· contribute to effective project management;
· provide good technical support to the school;
· develop a good working partnership with the school;
· regularly communicate with the school to monitor and review the process;
· provide training, support and advice to schools for the integration of ICT into the
curriculum;
· in the planning stages seek reports/research evidence of similar initiatives in other
schools/local authorities;
· in the planning stages when designing a building for joint school/community use,
consider the differing needs of school and adult users, both in terms of access and
security;
· keep a written record of decision taking etc. for continuity in case staff leave their
position.
Schools and the Senior Management Team
Need support from the local authority to provide:
· a powerful and robust infrastructure to deliver learning and teaching visions;
· reliable and up-to-date equipment which is fit for purpose;
· ongoing technical support;
· an effective ICT infrastructure to support mobile technologies;
· help with integrating ICT into the curriculum;
· funding for up-dating/renewing of equipment as necessary.
Should:
· conduct a risk analysis at the planning stages, and have contingencies available if
original intentions do not go according to plan;
· in the planning stages seek reports/research evidence of similar initiatives in other
schools/local authorities;
· be flexible and if original intentions are not possible, consider and implement
contingency plans rather than pursue a lost cause;
· communicate regularly with all relevant parties, e.g. the local authority;
· provide technical support to the staff and pupils;
· manage reliability problems to reduce their impact on learning and classroom
routines;
· provide training/staff development opportunities for staff to integrate ICT into the
curriculum;
· encourage staff to share good practice in the use of ICT for teaching and learning;
· achieve an appropriate blend of desktop and portable computer availability to
maximize the flexibility and cost effectiveness of provision;
· establish and maintain good working partnership arrangements with the community
provision;
· be aware of the need to balance the security issues for pupils with the community
needs, to ensure user-friendly access for adults in shared school/adult provision.
Laptop/tablet PC use
· invent systems and protocols which embed a culture and expectation of use by
teachers and pupils;
· consider the most effective deployment of laptop/tablet PCs within the school to
benefit pupil use.
Teachers
Need:
· technical support;
· training/staff development/time to fully integrate ICT into curricular areas.
Should:
· create lesson start-up routines and procedures which pre-empt problems of initial
computer and network start-up delays.
· create an expectation that laptop/tablet PCs will be used for most lessons if pupils are
given personal use of one;
· give more ownership/control of ICT use to empower pupil learning;
· consider adapting the curriculum to using ICT, rather than simply using as a tool;
· acknowledge the ICT skills/knowledge pupils already have from their own personal
and social uses.
Pupils
Need:
· a dedicated person within the school to go to for technical support;
· a place to store a laptop/tablet PC to save carrying it around all day.
Should:
· have an expectation that laptops/tablet PCs will be used for most lessons;
· be given greater responsibility and opportunity to choose when to use ICT;
· take responsibility for using a laptop/tablet PC.
Community
Need:
· regular on-site presence of staff to encourage and sustain student provision;
· establish and maintain good working partnership arrangements with the school;
· a dedicated separate entrance in a shared school/community building.
The full report can be downloaded in PDF format by clicking on the link below:-